Survey Design

BACKGROUND

Like the resistivity method, the refraction seismic method is employed (usually) as an active method. A source of seismic energy is initiated, and the ground motion produced by this source is recorded at various distances from the source. As you could see from your experience with the resistivity method, the application of active geophysical methods generally requires more logistical forethought than the passive methods. By this, we simply mean that there is more equipment involved and more survey parameters that must be chosen. Because of this, however, we usually have more control over noise reduction and the regions of the earth that perturb our signals than we would with a passive method.

With the seismic method, we can control even more variables related to survey design than we did with the resistivity method. In addition to the configuration of the receivers (including spacing and orientation), in the seismic method, the source can be moved independently of the receivers and different types of sources can be employed. With all of these variables and the expense of the equipment required to collect and interpret the observations, seismic methods tend to be more expensive than the other geophysical methods. Thus, reconnaissance surveys, like resistivity surveys, are often employed before acquiring seismic data in an effort to determine the necessity of doing seismic exploration and to determine the best survey design parameters to use when acquiring the seismic observations.

OBJECTIVES

There are five learning objectives for this project:

PROCEDURE

You are to submit a bid for a refraction seismic survey to determine the geometry of water table and the saturated alluvium/bedrock interface beneath the site. As defined in the Request for Bid, special interest should be given to determining 1) whether a sufficient groundwater reservoir exists beneath the site to be used for supplying water to the site, and 2) whether the ground under the site is part of the Clear Creek watershed. You will follow the same procedure we have used for all of the surveys up to this point (estimate amplitude and frequency of signal and noise, design a survey to enhance the signal and minimize the noise at the lowest overall cost, and estimate the cost of the survey). The following are the steps that should be taken to complete the bid:

OUTCOMES

The final report should be in the form of a bid. The heading can be in standard memo format. The bid must include survey design parameters, a summary of the decision-making process that led to that design (including an estimate of the likelihood that the survey will work), a brief discussion of the advantages and disadvantages of a controlled- source experiment, and a firm statement of total cost. The report must be no longer than two typewritten pages, but details (flowchart of the survey design process, tabulation of survey design parameters, breakdown of costs, etc.) can be included as appendices. Be sure to look at the Request for Bid to ensure that you have included in your bid everything that the client has requested. Remember that the bid is a sales document; it should communicate quickly and effectively and should focus on those issues that will be of most interest to the client.


FAQ E-Mail Return to Main Seismic Page
or use your browser's Back button
Return to Main Seismic Page Email to instructor Frequently-Asked Questions